Rachel’s Curse

עִ֠ם אֲשֶׁ֨ר תִּמְצָ֣א אֶת־אֱלֹהֶ֘יךָ֮ לֹ֣א יִֽחְיֶה֒ נֶ֣גֶד אַחֵ֧ינוּ הַֽכֶּר־לְךָ֛ מָ֥ה עִמָּדִ֖י וְקַֽח־לָ֑ךְ וְלֹֽא־יָדַ֣ע יַעֲקֹ֔ב כִּ֥י רָחֵ֖ל גְּנָבָֽתַם׃
But anyone with whom you find your gods shall not remain alive! In the presence of our kin, point out what I have of yours and take it.” Jacob, of course, did not know that Rachel had stolen them.
Genesis 31:32 (The Contemporary Torah, JPS 2006)

There is a view among the Rabbis that Genesis 31:32 is the cause of Rachel’s death in chapter 35. Because she did possess the idols/teraphim in question, she fell under Jacob’s curse and was doomed to die.

I disagree.

I think we are meant to understand that Jacob believed this to be true, but the astute reader should recognize the careful wording.

Look at the condition of Jacob’s curse: “anyone WITH WHOM YOU FIND your gods…”

Was Rachel FOUND with the idols? Did Laben recover them? The answer is no, and therefore, the curse is not triggered.

Why did you Steal my Gods?

וְעַתָּה֙ הָלֹ֣ךְ הָלַ֔כְתָּ כִּֽי־נִכְסֹ֥ף נִכְסַ֖פְתָּה לְבֵ֣ית אָבִ֑יךָ לָ֥מָּה גָנַ֖בְתָּ אֶת־אֱלֹהָֽי׃
Very well, you had to leave because you were longing for your father’s house; but why did you steal my gods?
Genesis 31:30 (The Contemporary Torah, JPS 2006)

This is arguably one of the funniest passages in the whole Bible.

But actually, there’s quite a bit of depth here. In the Hebrew, “longing for your father’s house” can hint at the True Father’s house: the very dwelling place of God. In which case, the question is very relevant, if the accusation is true. Why would anyone bring idols into the house of God?

The Parable of the Adversary

יֶשׁ־לְאֵ֣ל יָדִ֔י לַעֲשׂ֥וֹת עִמָּכֶ֖ם רָ֑ע וֵֽאלֹהֵ֨י אֲבִיכֶ֜ם אֶ֣מֶשׁ ׀ אָמַ֧ר אֵלַ֣י לֵאמֹ֗ר הִשָּׁ֧מֶר לְךָ֛ מִדַּבֵּ֥ר עִֽם־יַעֲקֹ֖ב מִטּ֥וֹב עַד־רָֽע׃
I have it in my power to do you harm; but the God of your father’s [house] said to me last night, ‘Beware of attempting anything with Jacob, good or bad.’
Genesis 31:29 (The Contemporary Torah, JPS 2006)

If Genesis is understood like a series of parables, perhaps Genesis 31:29 is teaching us about the nature of the Adversary.

Speak Neither Tov nor Ra

Then God came to Laban the Aramean in a dream at night and said to him, “Be careful not to say anything to Jacob, either good or bad.
Genesis 31:24 (NIV)

What’s fascinating about this passage is that the “good or bad” is the same “tov” and “ra” from the garden. It points to the deception of the serpent re: the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
Laban is called “the Aramean,” which we already know refers to his trickery.

The Third Day

On the third day Laban was told that Jacob had fled. Taking his relatives with him, he pursued Jacob for seven days and caught up with him in the hill country of Gilead. Then God came to Laban the Aramean in a dream at night and said to him, “Be careful not to say anything to Jacob, either good or bad.
Genesis 31:22-24 (NIV)

If we allow Genesis to inform our theology, and we frame Jacob’s deliverance of the sheep and the goats to stand in as a parable about God delivering his people, what do you suppose this passage is telling us?

It seems important.

The Teraphim

The word “teraphim” occurs 16 times in the Bible. The very first time it’s mentioned, it’s in Genesis 31, where Rachel steals them from her father’s house.

Some translations say “household idols” or “images.” In the Genesis account, they’re small enough to hide in a saddle bag and sit on them. But in 1 Samuel 19:13, King David’s wife Michal put one in her bed and pretended it was David when guards came to kill him. So… person-sized.

So the size isn’t a critical part of the definition of a teraphim. But there is some agreement in the Jewish studies and extra-biblical sources that suggest they are human-shaped. Or part of a human. And this is where it gets very, very strange.

Several rabbinical sources suggest that it’s really just the head. But like… an actual embalmed human head, and in some cases, the head of a child. Always the first-born. The head would be severed, and then salted to prevent spoiling, and then a small golden tablet with a “divine name” carved into it would be placed under the tongue, and then the head would be mounted somewhere in the house.

It was believed that the disembodied head was imbued with magic or perhaps tied to some spirit (the name of which was on the golden tablet), and the head… would speak. It could tell you things otherwise impossible to know. Zecharaiah 10:2 mentions the teraphim that “spoke deceitfully.” They were useful for diviners, and Laban claims divination back in Gen 30:27. He would have used the teraphim for this.

All quite strange. Why would Rachel steal something like this from her father? Is this a righteous act or an idolatrous act?
The rabbis seem to agree that this is not about Rachel’s desire to posses the teraphim for herself. There are several reasons for this belief.

1. The first suggestion is that Rachel, being righteous, is attempting to remove idolatry from her father. Like, take away his gods, and he can’t worship them, and maybe he’ll realize how silly it is that his gods could possibly be stolen. That would make the gods rather powerless and worthless.

2. The second suggestion is that Rachel believes the teraphim work, and she takes them from her father to prevent him from discovering where they’re going. Rachel is Laban’s daughter, after all, and likely grew up with such beliefs.

3. And perhaps most compelling: according to extra-biblical sources, the teraphim were considered “household” gods, and therefore were associated with the rights of *inheritance.* Rachel & Leah already complained about their father giving them nothing in Gen 31:14, so this is Rachel’s way of wrestling for an inheritance of some kind.

But given the teraphim status of “idols” and the incompatabilty of idol worship/ownership with the God of Israel, the pattern of how to deal with idols is officially established in Genesis 35:2-4:

So Jacob said to his household and to all who were with him, “Get rid of the foreign gods you have with you, and purify yourselves and change your clothes. Then come, let us go up to Bethel, where I will build an altar to God, who answered me in the day of my distress and who has been with me wherever I have gone.” So they gave Jacob all the foreign gods they had and the rings in their ears, and Jacob buried them under the oak at Shechem.
Genesis 35:2-4 (NIV)

It’s assumed (but not stated) that this is the resting place of Laban’s teraphim.

Note where the idols are buried: under the oak at Shechem. If you’ve followed along my Genesis posts, this should sound familiar. The oak at Shechem is where Abram first builds an altar to God.

Abram traveled through the land as far as the site of the great tree of Moreh at Shechem. At that time the Canaanites were in the land. The Lord appeared to Abram and said, “To your offspring I will give this land.” So he built an altar there to the Lord, who had appeared to him.
Genesis 12:6-7 (NIV)

So the text appears to teach us: your idols, the idols of your father, or your grasping at an earthly inheritance… those must all be buried at the place where you worship the God of the Promises.

It is the only way.

Priorities of the Righteous

Then Jacob put his children and his wives on camels…
Genesis 31:17 (NIV)

Esau took his wives and sons and daughters and all the members of his household…
Genesis 36:6 (NIV)

I’m so enthralled by the Jewish studies and interpretations of the Torah.

Look closely at Genesis 31:17 and Genesis 36:6. The rabbis note that Jacob’s priorities were his children, and then his wives, whereas Esau’s priorities were his wives, and then his children. This was written this way intentionally, to teach us something.

What do you suppose it means?

Now, I am a little influenced by some of the Jewish writings on this, so my answer isn’t entirely my own, but I do have my own spin on it.

I think that the Children of Israel are a picture of a promise, and this promise is about the future. They are the hope. The wives, on the other hand, are a symbol of *right now.*

Jacob is thinking on the promise; Esau is thinking on his current and ever-present appetite. Food, sex, and violence.

Daughters’ Inheritance

Then Rachel and Leah replied, “Do we still have any share in the inheritance of our father’s estate? Does he not regard us as foreigners? Not only has he sold us, but he has used up what was paid for us.
Genesis 31:14-15 (NIV)

Genesis 31:14-15 is a veiled rebuke of a system that reduces women to property – a way of life associated with the wickedness of Laban.
Their statement paints a picture of how it should have been. Daughters should have a share in the inheritance.

God’s Plunder

וַיַּצֵּ֧ל אֱלֹהִ֛ים אֶת־מִקְנֵ֥ה אֲבִיכֶ֖ם וַיִּתֶּן־לִֽי׃

God has taken away your father’s livestock and given it to me.
Genesis 31:9 (The Contemporary Torah, JPS 2006)

This phrase “taken away” has the same root as the word used by Moses when Israel “plundered” the Egyptians during the Exodus.
The word is natsal. It means to deliver.

We are God’s plunder, rescued and delivered into the hands of the shepherd.