The Fire of God

And Abraham took the wood for the burnt offering and laid it on his son Isaac, and he took in his hand the fire and the knife. So the two of them walked on together.
Genesis 22:6 (NASB)

Fire is dangereous. It burns. It destroys. But when you look carefully at scripture, it is also a symbol of where God dwells.

The first time we see this Hebrew word אֵשׁ (esh), or fire, it’s when God passes between the pieces of the sacrifice before Abraham. It’s there that we first learn that God reveals himself in the flame.

Now it came about, when the sun had set, that it was very dark, and behold, a smoking oven and a flaming torch appeared which passed between these pieces.
Genesis 15:17 (NASB)

The next time we see it, God rains down fire and brimstone from heaven onto the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. When Lot’s wife looked back at the destruction of the city, we wonder: did she see God in the ensuing pillar of fire? Is this why she died?

Then the Lord rained brimstone and fire on Sodom and Gomorrah from the Lord out of heaven.
Genesis 19:24 (NASB)

After Genesis, the next time we see the esh, it’s in the Burning Bush, where God meets Moses.

Then the angel of the Lord appeared to him in a blazing fire from the midst of a bush; and he looked, and behold, the bush was burning with fire, yet the bush was not being consumed.
Exodus 3:2 (NASB)

So in this passage in Genesis 22, with the fire in his hand, we read that Abraham walks with his son. Together.

Perhaps we’re meant to understand that God is there, too.

God Laughing with Joy

One teaching in the Midrash breaks down Genesis 22:2 as though it’s a conversation between God and Abraham, like this

God: Please take your son.
Abraham: Which son? I have two!
God: Your only son.
Abraham: But each son is the only son of their mother!
God: The one you love.
Abraham: But I love both of them!
God: Isaac <– LAUGHS!

We know that Isaac means “to laugh” or “to make laugh” in Hebrew. If we view God as being one who experiences our joy and hope, as well as our pain and difficulties, perhaps this can be read to teach us that God experienced the joy of Abraham’s love for BOTH of his sons. God saying “Isaac” in this conversation could also point to God’s joy.

This may be a lesson. Love others well, regardless of their journeys.

Conversation with God

Then He said, “Take now your son, your only son, whom you love, Isaac, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I will tell you.”
Genesis 22:2 (NASB)

Genesis 22:2 is written in a strange way. The rabbis suggest that it is written like a slowly unfolding conversation, with an implied back-and-forth between God and Abraham.

The Midrash breaks it down like this:

God: Please take your son.
Abraham: Which son? I have two!
God: I mean your only son.
Abraham: But each son is the only son of their mother!
God: I mean the one you love.
Abraham: But I love both of them!
God: I mean Isaac.

And they point out that this narrowing of focus from broad to specific is nearly identical to the way God calls Abraham back in Genesis 12:

Now the Lord said to Abram,

“Go from your country,
And from your relatives
And from your father’s house,
To the land which I will show you.
Genesis 12:1 (NASB)

“From your country… from your relatives… from your father’s house.”

Genesis 12 is referred to as the לֶךְ־לְךָ (Lech-Lecha) in Hebrew. This is the “Go!” instruction that kicks off Abraham’s amazing journey.

Further linking the two passages, “Lech-Lecha” shows up only twice in the Torah: Genesis 12, and again here in Genesis 22.

In some ways, both stories are BEGINNINGS. Not that anything resets, or starts over, but perhaps this kicks off a repeated theme that God will make all things new.

Or perhaps they are telling the same story: Leave everything – your known past and your expected future.

When God Tests Us

Now it came about after these things, that God tested Abraham, and said to him, “Abraham!” And he said, “Here I am.”
Genesis 22:1 (NASB)

If you think God “tests” us with difficulty, you might conclude that we can fail that test. You might think the test is about performance. “How holy are you?

You might come to resent a God who would test us and cause us to lose things we love. But you’ve misunderstood.

The Hebrew word for “test” (some translations say “tempt”) is נָסָה (nasah), and this word appears for the first time in the Bible here in Genesis 22. The picture is NOT of us standing before God and having our righteousness tested like some kind of morality pop-quiz.

The word nasah means proved.

It does not mean that God demanded that Abraham perform in order for him to prove himself worthy to God. The text says the opposite of this. Look more closely!

The text says GOD PROVED ABRAHAM.

And there’s another clue in the same verse.

The Hebrew word nasah (proved) is in the pi’el perfect form (nissah), which implies that it DID happen… not that it would happen later.

So when did God PROVE Abraham?

It’s in the same verse. God says “Abraham!” and Abraham responds “I’m here.”

The PROOF of God’s people is that when God calls us by name, we will hear him. When God demonstrates His great love to us, we will respond in worship. Our hearts will melt, and we will draw near in trust and in hope.

Because our God is good.

A Willing Sacrifice

We tend to picture Isaac as a child when Abraham is told to sacrifice him, but much of the Jewish commentary says that Isaac is a 37 year old man by this time, and that the story is as much about Isaac’s willingness to obey his father as his fathers obedience to God.

The Midrash contains a story that says Isaac, in his desire to be obedient, asked his father to also tie his hands and feet, because the urge to break free and escape death was so strong.

Abraham’s Silence

How do we know that Abraham doesn’t believe he’s going to lose his son Isaac when God tells Abraham to sacrifice him? Genesis 22:5 gives us a clue, but the writers of “The Torah: A Woman’s Commentary” note Abraham’s negotiations over Sodom and his advocating for Ishmael as a point of contrast. Unlike in those instances, Abraham does not plead for Isaac in this part of the text.

Abraham’s silence over Isaac communicates so much.

Job and Abraham

If you were wondering why I would interrupt my Genesis study with a conversation about Job, it’s because we are journeying into Genesis 22: The Binding of Isaac.

Both passages are extremely difficult, and for very similar reasons. But also… they are linked: Extreme suffering, loss of everything… both stories leave the reader wondering if God is actually “good.”

Some will read the texts and escape the difficulty by leaning into a detached piety: “Our suffering is a part of God’s plan, so we can’t question it.” Others will try to make comparisons: “Our suffering is nothing compared to the reward that awaits us.”

Unfortunately, both views shy away from the actual experience of the one who is suffering.

Perhaps my least favorite view is those who actually BLAME Job and Abraham, as though the experience is meant to purify them.

The similarities between Job and Genesis 22 aren’t merely about grief or loss. There are other clues that link the story in very strange ways.

There was a man in the land of Uz whose name was Job; and that man was blameless, upright, fearing God and turning away from evil.
Job 1:1 (NASB)

Now it came about after these things, that Abraham was told, saying, “Behold, Milcah also has borne children to your brother Nahor: Uz his firstborn, Buz his brother, Kemuel (the father of Aram)
Genesis 22:20-21 (NASB)

Job is from the land of Uz. But Uz is also mentioned as a name in Genesis 22: Uz is the firstborn son of Abraham’s brother.

Prior to this, Uz is first mentioned as a name in Genesis 10 in the Table of Nations.

The sons of Shem were Elam, Asshur, Arpachshad, Lud, and Aram. The sons of Aram were Uz, Hul, Gether, and Mash.
Genesis 10:22-23 (NASB)

Noah -> Shem -> Aram -> Uz.

So the Land of Uz has a familial tie to Abraham, and the family appears to have kept the name. But it’s very interesting to see it here in Genesis 22.

So the rabbis look at this, and then look at how Genesis 22 begins and they wonder if the stories are more than coincidentally connected.

This is how Genesis 22 begins: וַיְהִי אַחַר הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה. “It came to pass AFTER THESE THINGS…

This is very strange!

If you were a student, and you were given a reading assignment that started with “After these things…” you would immediately flip the paper over and wonder if you had missed something. After WHAT things?

So the rabbis do what you’d expect. They check the previous chapter.

And the previous chapter ends with “And Abraham stayed in the land of the Philistines for MANY DAYS.”

In fact, we know that between the end of Genesis 21 (where Isaac has just been weened, so… age 2?) and the beginning of Genesis 22, YEARS have passed. Not just days.

How many years? Enough years for Isaac to be strong enough to carry a load of wood for a sacrifice.

And Abraham took the wood for the burnt offering and laid it on his son Isaac, and he took in his hand the fire and the knife. So the two of them walked on together.
Genesis 22:6 (NASB)

The rabbis tend to agree that Isaac is either about 13 – the same age as Ishmael when Ishmael was circumcized, or he is about 37, depending on when Chapter 23 begins.

Remember – Sarah is old, and [SPOILER ALERT!] she’s going to die in chapter 23. And when Isaac get a bride, we have this verse that ties his mother’s death to the timing.

Then Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah’s tent, and he took Rebekah, and she became his wife, and he loved her; so Isaac was comforted after his mother’s death.
Genesis 24:67 (NASB)

So, Isaac is either 13 or 37, or somewhere in between. Either way, Genesis 21’s “many days” shows nothing of interest happening, so the rabbis and students scratch their heads at the meaning of “After these things.”

What could this be talking about?

The Midrash offers a story that further ties us to Job.

Perhaps “these things” are hidden from us. Maybe something happens in the heavenly court that results in God asking Abraham to sacrifice his son.

Maybe Satan approaches God here, like he does in Job.

So God says: “Have you considered my servant Abraham?”

Regarding Job, Satan says “He worships because you’ve blessed him and put a hedge of protection around him.”

Regarding Abraham, perhaps Satan says “He worships because you gave him a son.”

In both cases, he says: “take it away and see if he doesn’t curse you to your face.”

As I wrote in an earlier post about Job, the heavenly court isn’t necessarily literal. It shows us that God is not surprised by calamity. There is nothing God doesn’t know, and no adversity too great. That’s what we, the reader, are reminded.

But Abraham already knows this by now.

Abraham has met adversity, some of which was his own fault (deceiving Pharaoh and Abimelech), and some of it was not his fault (Abimelech’s men seizing Abe’s wells). At this point in the story, we should know that Abraham has gained an understanding of these things. That’s what his story has been so far.

So Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice Isaac is later explained by the writer of Hebrews as something Abraham was only willing to do because he BELIEVED God would raise up Isaac if Isaac died (Hebrews 11:17-19).

But this belief in God not actually killing (or perhaps resurrecting) Isaac is not a strictly Christian belief. Even the Jewish Midrash says something similar – that Abraham knew that both he and his son would come down the mountain. They point to Genesis 22:5.

Then Abraham said to his young men, “Stay here with the donkey, and I and the boy will go over there; and we will worship and return to you.
Genesis 22:5 (NASB)

Perhaps this knowledge is key to understanding this story.

In Job, we’re told about the heavenly court, and Job is NOT aware of it. He struggles with understanding and acceptance of what’s happening.

In Genesis 22, we’re NOT told about God’s plans or any heavenly court, but Abraham is aware of it in some way. We see him move forward as though he knows what’s going to happen next.

We see Abraham trust.

Who is Your Father?

Now Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, whom she had borne to Abraham, mocking Isaac. Therefore she said to Abraham, “Drive out this slave woman and her son, for the son of this slave woman shall not be an heir with my son Isaac!”
Genesis 21:9-10 (NASB)

There is a story in the Midrash that paints a sweeping narrative that creates context for these two verses. It starts back in the previous chapter, when Sarah is taken by Abimelech.

So Abraham prayed to God; and God healed Abimelech, his wife, and his female servants. Then they bore children; for the Lord had closed up all the wombs of the house of Abimelech because of Sarah, Abraham’s wife.
Genesis 20:17-18 (NKJV)

Remember: the healing that happens in that chapter is related to childbirth.

Based on this childbirth-related healing, and then the birth of Isaac in chapter 21, the rabbis suggest that rumors began to spread. Perhaps this son of Sarah is no son of Abraham, but instead is a son of Abimelech. The timing is right, and clearly, Abimelech’s wife and “female servants” are all pregnant.

While we, the readers, are told that God prevented Abimelech from touching Sarah, who knows if the people in the story, to include Abraham’s whole entourage, believe it?

And most importantly, does Hagar believe it? She has witnessed Abraham and Sarah’s frequent deception first-hand.

So the rabbis say this: “the prattle of children reflects what they picked up from their father or what they picked up from their mother.” If Ishmael is “mocking” Isaac (and not abusing, per another interpretation of the story), perhaps the mockery is this: “Everyone knows Abraham is my father. Who is your father?

And Sarah, hearing this, would know that these are Hagar’s words, and that Hagar would be making a clear statement about inheritance: Only the son of Abraham should receive any portion of Abraham’s blessing and wealth.

Perhaps this is why Sarah declares, “the son of this slave woman shall not be an heir with my son Isaac!”

Fountain of Youth

And she said, “Who would have said to Abraham that Sarah would nurse children? Yet I have given birth to a son in his old age.”
Genesis 21:7 (NASB)

There is a teaching in the Jewish commentaries that say Sarah experienced a reversal of age and literally became a young woman again in order to give birth to Isaac and to nurse him until weened.

In this chapter, when Isaac is born, only Abraham’s age is referenced.

Whether Sarah literally became a youthful woman again (so beautiful that even a Pharaoh would find her desirable!) or not is immaterial. It changes nothing. However, in some ways, she did experience something that’s only possible for younger women – to give birth, and to nurse a child until it is weened.

In contrast, Abraham appears to remain old in every way.

A Mother’s Instincts

Now Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, whom she had borne to Abraham, mocking Isaac. Therefore she said to Abraham, “Drive out this slave woman and her son, for the son of this slave woman shall not be an heir with my son Isaac!”
Genesis 19:9-10 (NASB)

It’s difficult to understand why Sarah is so upset in this story when you read the English. Most translations render the word צִחֵּק (tsichek) to show Ishmael “mocking,” or “making fun of” Isaac.

But Sarah’s reaction is based on something much more concerning.

Up until this moment in scripture, nearly every instance of this word was in the Qal, or basic form: “laughter.” Abraham laughs, Sarah laughs, Isaac’s name is יִצְחָק (Yitzḥaq), and it’s the causitive form of this same word, so it means “to make laugh.”

But in Genesis 19:14, the word changes form.

So Lot went out and spoke to his sons-in-law, who were to marry his daughters, and said, “Up, get out of this place, for the Lord is destroying the city.” But he appeared to his sons-in-law to be joking.
Genesis 19:14 (NASB)

Here, tzachak becomes *tzichek.*

Lot’s sons-in-law think he is “joking” about the cities being destroyed. The context shows they didn’t take him seriously, so they didn’t go with him. That’s a proper use of this form of the word.

Is this what Sarah sees Ishmael doing to Isaac? Does she Ishmael just goofing around and gets annoyed by it?

If instead of looking backwards to Genesis 19, we instead look forward for the use of this word, it gets dark, quickly.

The next two times the pi’el form of this word shows up in Genesis, it carries a sexual connotation.

Now it came about, when he had been there a long time, that Abimelech king of the Philistines looked down through a window, and saw them, and behold, Isaac was caressing his wife Rebekah.
Genesis 26:8 (NASB)

She called to the men of her household and said to them, “See, he has brought in a Hebrew to us to make fun of us; he came in to me to sleep with me, and I screamed.
Genesis 39:14 (NASB)

After that, it shows up in Exodus, and it’s connected to both sexual activity and idolatry. This passage describes the people in front of the golden calf.

So the next day they got up early and offered burnt offerings, and brought peace offerings; and the people sat down to eat and to drink, and got up to engage in lewd behavior.
Exodus 32:6 (NASB)

The final time it shows up in scripture is with the story of Samson, when he’s led out to “entertain the Philistines.”

It so happened when they were in high spirits, that they said, “Call for Samson, that he may amuse us.” So they called for Samson from the prison, and he entertained them. And they made him stand between the pillars.
Judges 16:25 (NASB)

And this makes me wonder how Samson is actually being treated here. It’s very likely that he is naked for their amusement. For their pleasure.

If we read Sarah’s reaction to be tied to this forward view of tzichek, the picture is much more concerning. Perhaps we are meant to see that Sarah believes Ishmael is going to do something terrible to her son.

So she does what any mother would do.