Patterns in the Ages

Genesis is full of patterns that are intended to draw your attention; breaks in the repetition should make you stop and ask, “Why?”

Genesis 5 lists the ages in the generations between Adam and Noah, and a few stand out. The youngest, the oldest, and the one with the strange number.

Methuselah lived the longest – 969 years. His name is linked to his long life, which was not just for his benefit, but for the benefit of humanity as God restrained the Flood until after Methuselah died.

Enoch notably never died.

And Lamech? He shares a name with a notable man in Cain’s genealogy. Cain’s Lamech is man of seventy-seven-fold vengeance. But the Lamech of Genesis 5 goes down a different path. Not one of vengeance, but of Comfort.

So many Sevens

Lamech said to his wives,

“Adah and Zillah, listen to me;
wives of Lamech, hear my words.
I have killed a man for wounding me,
a young man for injuring me.
If Cain is avenged seven times,
then Lamech seventy-seven times
.”
Genesis 4:23-24 (NIV)

Seventh from Cain, we have Lamech boasting a 7-fold to 77-fold vengeance. I mentioned previously that Jesus flips this with this a 7-fold to 77-fold forgiveness.

When Lamech had lived 182 years, he had a son. He named him Noah and said, “He will comfort us in the labor and painful toil of our hands caused by the ground the Lord has cursed.” After Noah was born, Lamech lived 595 years and had other sons and daughters. Altogether, Lamech lived a total of 777 years, and then he died.
Genesis 5:28-31

Eighth down the line from Seth in Genesis 5, we have a different Lamech, tied to the number 777.

Lamech’s son is Noah: Comfort.

In Hebrew numerology, 7 means completion. Perfection. But 8 symbolizes new creation. A new order.

It’s so fascinating. It’s like the numbers tell us about God creating a new order, undoing vengeance and overcoming it with forgiveness to bring us comfort.

Abel’s Wife

Perhaps Abel was married.

Consider the law of the Kinsman Redeemer:

If brothers dwell together, and one of them dies and has no son, the widow of the dead man shall not be married to a stranger outside the family; her husband’s brother shall go in to her, take her as his wife, and perform the duty of a husband’s brother to her. And it shall be that the firstborn son which she bears will succeed to the name of his dead brother, that his name may not be blotted out of Israel.
Deuteronomy 25:5-6

This law defines how to be a “brother’s keeper.” Perhaps we’re told that Cain left and knew his wife (Genesis 4:16-17) specifically because he wouldn’t marry Abel’s wife in order to continue his dead brother’s name.

To Know

The fact that Genesis 4 opens up with “Adam KNEW his wife” is striking. Yes, this is the Hebrew way of saying sex, but the wording suggests that immediately prior to this chapter, Adam did not know Eve. Not really.

We read that “their eyes were open” in Genesis 3, but perhaps “seeing” does not mean “knowing.” It requires something more.

Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, and said, “I have acquired a man from the Lord.”
Genesis 4:1 (NKJV)

Forgiveness is Greater than Vengeance

When Jesus tells Peter to forgive 70 times 7 (or 77, depending on translation), He is countering the vengeance in the story of Cain and Lamech.

Then Peter came to Jesus and asked, “Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother or sister who sins against me? Up to seven times?
Jesus answered, “I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times.
Matthew 18:21-22 (NIV)

Lamech said to his wives,

“Adah and Zillah, listen to me;
wives of Lamech, hear my words.
I have killed a man for wounding me,
a young man for injuring me.
If Cain is avenged seven times,
then Lamech seventy-seven times.”
Genesis 4:23-24 (NIV)

Wrath

But on Cain and his offering he did not look with favor. So Cain was very angry, and his face was downcast.
Genesis 4:5 (NIV)

It is ok to be angry. It’s ok to be “VERY angry.”

But the word here is a kindled fire. It is wrath that points to vengeance and destruction… only we are not wise enough to know how to apply it rightly, so it burns out of control.

This wrath is reserved for God, who is the only one who can wield it correctly.

Motherhood and the First Born

You’re not supposed to hate Cain in the story. You’re supposed to look at him through the eyes of a grieving mother who believed that he was the answer to all her problems.

You can relate to Eve, because we’ve all put our trust in something and had it fall apart on us, and perhaps you can relate to Cain, who was under a lot of pressure from his mother.

Adam’s Role

In the Bible, the father is normally the person listed as naming the children, but it’s Eve who names both Cain and Abel in Genesis 3. Adam isn’t involved.

Eve names Seth, but in Genesis 5, the text says Adam does, so the implication may be that they both did. And perhaps that’s the point. We are meant to work together.

More Separations

Genesis 1-3 gives us separations: Heaven/Earth, Waters above/below, Land/Water, Birds/Fish, Animals/Humans, Man/Woman, 2 Trees, Good/Evil, Humanity/Eden, etc., etc.

Genesis 4 does the same, but in an entirely new way. But we are given clues throughout the narrative.

We are shown two brothers: Cain/Abel. Two sacrifices: works/faith.

In Cain’s line, we have Lamech who has two wives. Adah has two sons: Jabal and Jubal. Zillah has two children: Tubal-Cain and Na’amah.

It’s like we are being shown a river that has split into two streams. Paths.

Interestingly, we also are introduced to words that have TWO meanings that are often opposites of one another.

SIN and SIN-OFFERING

Mehujael means both “ALIVE in God” and “KILLED by God”

And then the chapter ends with an EXTREMELY strange word: halel.

Seth also had a son, and he named him Enosh.

At that time people began to call on the name of the Lord.
Genesis 4:26 (NIV)

Most of our bibles end Genesis 4 with this sentence:

“At that time men began to CALL upon the name of the Lord.” (implying worship)

But some render it this way:

“At that time men began to PROFANE the name of the Lord.” (implying the OPPOSITE of worship)

If you look at the concordance for this word, it’s very odd. Most meanings of this word basically equate to blaspheme, or piercing/wounding (interesting), or (oddly) playing the flute.

But also “to begin.”

1. to profane, defile, pollute, desecrate, begin
2. to wound (fatally), bore through, pierce, bore
3. to play the flute or pipe
H2490: חָלַל (ḥālal)

So translators tried to use context to figure this out.

The problem is that context does not help. It can either mean that people began to worship, or began to take God’s name in vain…

or… both?

I believe some of these words are actually intended to be seen BOTH ways; how you read it depends on what God is showing you.

Consider the central message of the sacrifice God found unacceptable: the fruits of Cain’s labor from the ground is cursed (Genesis 3). His best efforts. His accomplishments. His works.

And God says “I don’t want your works.”

Depending on who you are, this has two meanings.

If you are rooted in works, doing everything to EARN God’s favor, you’ll die trying. God won’t accept it. The words kill you.

If you are seeking God’s heart, you’ll know God is telling you that it’s not the works, but your very heart He desires. The words give you life.

So in Genesis 4, we see God separate something again, this time splitting our works from God’s work, and we also get a glimpse into what the consequence of works vs faith does with this character’s name Mehujael, which can mean “alive in God” or “killed by God.”

So at the end, when the text says that “men began to [something] the name of the Lord,” I suspect that it’s both. Some called out, pleading to God. Some profaned the name of God.

In some ways, that’s our own souls, isn’t it? We do both. We, too, ascribe God to our works.

But Genesis 4 is also about choices after our sin. In Gen 3, we hid and covered ourselves in fig leaves. In Genesis 4, we either lean into God, or try to cover our shame with our works. We live this choice.

But God accepts only one of them. He will not accept the other.

Trust after a Broken Heart

I’m not a mother, but I try to imagine the depth of hurt, ache, and the mixing of hope & hopelessness bound up in the birth of Seth.

Eve knows God will redeem the world through her children, but one is lost by murdering the other. All of her hope is destroyed.

She holds Seth.

How she must have trembled at his first cry. How she must have clung to him and pressed him close to her body, but also feared losing him, just like she lost the others.

Could she trust God with this child? She trusted him with the first two, and we know what happened.

I weep for Eve. For us.

How do we trust after we’ve been let down? How do we hope when everything we hoped for has been dashed?

The story of Eve and Seth is a story of God healing the broken hearted. It will require time. It will require God.